My Profile

Keep Up to Date:
Blog RSS
Blog
Forum RSS
Forum
Search

Buy & Sell

Used (Like New) $20

Post New Topic Post Reply
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
freerap
Expert Boarder
Posts: 123
graphgraph
User Offline
 
I have inquired before about a cover I have, which was addressed to a Canadian Grenadier Guardsman who apparently was killed at the time of the Battle for Falaise. He was a member of Company C, 22nd Canadian Armoured Regiment.

Now I have a new question: In a Canadian armoured company, what percentage of soldiers were tank crewmen, and what percentage were in support capacities? In other words, what was the liklihood that he was a tank crewman?

Bob Ingraham
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
klauzniksam
Expert Boarder
Posts: 109
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Any indication what Battalion, company, or platoon he was with? Any way to look up records for this?

Some space filling related information here follows:

With my experience, (not Canad. or WWII), but fairly likely reasonable figures. A Tank Platoon had about 45 in it, and 20 of them were tank crewmen for the 5 tanks. so chances would be about 45%.

Each Tank Company had the 3 tank platoons, plus about 50 more in the ?headquarters / service platoon? So more like 60 of 210, about 30%.

And thus at Bn & Regt. odds get progressivly less with more mechanics and clerks and cooks and truck drivers and planners required to complete the mission. (sent to group 3/24)
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
Lalalalar
Expert Boarder
Posts: 121
graphgraph
User Offline
 
The address on the envelope appears to read: 'Gdsm. R.J. Tester, 22nd C.A.B. [Canadian Armoured Brigade], C.G.G. [Canadian Grenadier Guards], No. 2 Sqdn., Can. Army Overseas.'

While the envelope has been heavily censored with smears of black ink, it is possible to make out the word 'DECEASED' beneath the only mark that might have had part of the address under it. There appear to be no other words beneath that particular mark. See a scan at <http://www.ingraham.ca/bob/testercovermedium.jpg>.

Bob Ingraham
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
Lalalalar
Expert Boarder
Posts: 121
graphgraph
User Offline
 
{snip}

The only info I can find is on British Arnmoured Squadrons, but they should give a rough idea. In 1944, cruiser squadrons had:

Squadron HQ (3 officers & 22 men) - operating 3-4 tanks plus support vehicles Five (or four) Tank Troops with 1 officer and 14 (or 19) men in 3 (or 4) tanks. Admin troop with 57 men - I guess these guys did maintenance & repair and A/B echelon supply stuff.

So the squadron strength is around 162 men, of which 75 (or 80) are in front line tank troops.

Cheers
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
limerpharm
Expert Boarder
Posts: 119
graphgraph
User Offline
 
my question about Canadian armoured regiment organization. The information provided was certainly detailed enough for my purpose, an article about about the KIA cover in question and Canada's wartime Ram tank stamp.

Bob Ingraham
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 3 Weeks ago
Sounder
Expert Boarder
Posts: 125
graphgraph
User Offline
 
But I would expect that the front line tank troops would be where most of the casulties came from, right? Certainly at the division level, but even at the squadron level I would think that the front line troops would take more casulties than the rear echelon fellows.

Given that we know he was a casulty, I would put the chances that this man was a tanker at greater than 50%.

Chris Manteuffel
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
Copyright © 2006 - Jan 2009 War History Fans